Post by MinerMan2010 on Apr 25, 2010 16:29:07 GMT -5
www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/story/13281267/future-of-ncaa-football-five-super-conferences?tag=coverlist_active;coverlist_footer
Probably one of the most unrealistic things I have ever seen. UTEP in the Big 12. According to this writer, the Big 12 South would have: UTEP, UNM, TCU, SMU, Houston, Rice, Tulsa, and Tulane!!! Meanwhile the Big 12 North would have: Texas Tech, Baylor, Kansas, Kansas St, Colorado, Colorado St, Nebraska, and Iowa St.
This is because the SEC took Texas, A&M, OU, and OSU! Why would the remaining 7 schools (Mizzou bolted to Big 10), add us and the others to their conference? They could still be a BCS conference with their current lineup. Why add schools that bring nothing to the table?
Probably one of the most unrealistic things I have ever seen. UTEP in the Big 12. According to this writer, the Big 12 South would have: UTEP, UNM, TCU, SMU, Houston, Rice, Tulsa, and Tulane!!! Meanwhile the Big 12 North would have: Texas Tech, Baylor, Kansas, Kansas St, Colorado, Colorado St, Nebraska, and Iowa St.
This is because the SEC took Texas, A&M, OU, and OSU! Why would the remaining 7 schools (Mizzou bolted to Big 10), add us and the others to their conference? They could still be a BCS conference with their current lineup. Why add schools that bring nothing to the table?
